Re: [RFR] templates://tipcutils/{templates}
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Template: tipcutils/default_ndd
[...]
> This setting will define the neighbor detection domain if there is
> no setting for a specific bearer.
> .
> Setting a NDD for a specific bearer is not yet possible in
> this package version.
I missed this before: "an NDD". But wait, should that be "setting
*the* NDD for a specific bearer", roughly analogous to something
like "setting the netmask for a specific interface"? "A netmask"...
"the appropriate netmask"... er, I think "the".
And de-capitalising Neighbor Detection Domain makes the connection
between initialism and expansion that little bit less obvious (it
doesn't help that ndd is the Solaris equivalent of ifconfig), so I'd
suggest:
This setting will define the neighbor detection domain (NDD) if there
is no setting for a specific bearer.
.
Setting the NDD for a specific bearer is not yet possible in
this package version.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: