This one time, at band camp, Christian Perrier said: > Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for the clamav source package. > > Template: clamav-base/debconf > Type: boolean > Default: true > -_Description: Do you want to handle the configuration file with debconf? > - There are quite a few options to be configured for clamav-base. > +_Description: Heandle the configuration file automatically? > + Some options must be configured for clamav-base. > > Do not mention "debconf" (this is jargon and users don't understand > what debconf is) > > More direct question and explanations s/Heandle/Handle/ But otherwise, looks good. Damn, you've reminded me to really review these templates. Quite a few of them are irrelevant post-sarge, and should probably be dropped. Should I merge your changes now, remove the obsoleted ones and update the ones that are no longer precisely true, and ask for a second round of review, or should I aim to make the updates first, and then we can revisit the review process once that's complete? I don't want to waste valuable translator time, but I also don't want to mess up an ongoing effort by being a road block of special cases. Thanks, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature