[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFR] templates://fltk1.1/{libfltk1.1-dev.templates}

Justin B Rye <jbr@edlug.org.uk> writes:

> Here's a version incorporating the phrase "should be eliminated" and
> dropping the "LGPLed".


> Now I look again I do notice a clear surplus of packaging in the
> description for libfltk1.1-dbg:

La la la. :-)  Good catch.

> But what "more information" is it talking about?  Should that final
> sentence be pointing at fltk1.1-doc, or is it maybe redundant now
> that each package description has a boilerplate explanation of FLTK?

The latter.

BTW, I'd favor "*The* Fast Light Toolkit" in the boilerplate.

Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu

Reply to: