Quoting Eddy Petri?or (eddy.petrisor@gmail.com): > >> netcfg/get_hostname > >> netcfg/invalid_hostname > > > > > > I don't really understand the point here. Why would the review we're > > doing on ppp templates lead to that needed change? > > Let me make this clear, given the fact that ppp templates are reviewed now and > ppp uses 2 of netcfg's templates directly, this is a good time to fix this issue > and complete ppp's templates with the missing templates (which it uses directly > from netcfg). > > That is a pending issue for the ppp package, but since I lost interest in ppp I > never got to do it myself (also not being a DD didn't help much). Hmmm, but why can't ppp continue to use the netcfg templates? This is not really prohibited after all.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature