Christian Perrier skrev: > Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original > files. Comments about your proposed changes will be appreciated. Not sure if I break your rules here - I have comments (is that what you call a "review"?) and have simply responded to the mail and quoted what I'd like to comment on... In general, I find your proposed changes very good. Thanks a lot! > + pop3: POP 3 on TCP port 110 with TLS support; > + pop3s: POP 3 on TCP port 995 with SSL support; > + pop2: (obsolete) POP 2 on TCP port 109 with TLS support. I suspect this will autowrap with some debconf frontends. Double (indented) newlines was used for that reason. > + The uw-imap daemon supports simultaneous listening on several ports. I believe this should instead be "simultaneously" here. But I am anon-native speaker too, so I am only guessing... > - NB! The Maildir storage format is currently not supported. > + The Maildir storage format is currently not supported. Whoops. That note should actually be dropped - Maildir has been (re)added to recent versions of uw-imap. > - NB! Non-encrypted network transport is discouraged and requires special > + Non-encrypted network transport is discouraged and requires special > configuration of the c-client library to work. > > Ditto. I'm not entirely convinced that this belongs to the package's > description, though. Agreed. Let's just drop it! > This package contains helper tools for the libc-client library: > - * mailutil: a utility program which helps manage email mailboxes (both > - local and IMAP/POP3/NNTP) > - * dmail: an MDA (Mail Delivery Agent) for use with procmail > - * tmail: an MDA for use with the system mailer (e.g. sendmail, postfix, > - etc.) > + - mailutil: utility program which helps manage email mailboxes (both > + local and IMAP/POP3/NNTP); > + - dmail: MDA (Mail Delivery Agent) for use with procmail; > + - tmail: MDA for use with the system mailer (e.g. sendmail, postfix, > + etc.). > . > Homepage: http://www.washington.edu/imap/ > > We standardized that method for bulletting. Also indent things > better. Leading articles removed. Is that indentation standardized too? Would you happen to know where I can read more about these new standards? Again, thanks for your great work! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature