Re: [RFR] templates://jed-extra/{templates}
- To: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org, jed-extra@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [RFR] templates://jed-extra/{templates}
- From: "G. Milde" <milde@users.sourceforge.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:55:23 +0200
- Message-id: <20070502075523.GC4811@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <20070430152253.GC10191@kheops.homeunix.org>
- References: <SmithReviewDebconf-jed-extra-intent-1177148380@mykerinos> <SmithReviewDebconf-jed-extra-rfr-1177426998@mykerinos> <20070424202840.GE3489@rustybear.com> <20070430152253.GC10191@kheops.homeunix.org>
On 30.04.07, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Kevin Coyner (kevin@rustybear.com):
> >
> > Perhaps descriptive references to SLang should be S-Lang. While
> > 'SLang' is commonly seen, the S-Lang homepage
> > (http://www.jedsoft.org/slang/) and most of the S-Lang .deb packages
> > refer to the library as 'S-Lang' in descriptions.
> JED folks, what do you think about this? Your advice seems important,
> here.
AFAIK, S-Lang is the "official" name and should be preferred.
"mode: SLang" is shown in the mode-line of Jed when the editor is in
"slang_mode". This might explain the occurence of SLang for S-Lang.
Guenter
Reply to: