[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[TAF] templates://ssbd/templates



The ssbd package introduced new or modified debconf
templates. This is the perfect moment for a review to help the package
maintainer following the general suggested writing style and track
down typos and errors in the use of English language.

If someone wants to pick up this review, please answer to this mail,
in the mailing list, with an [ITR] (Intent To Review) label.

The templates file is attached.

To propose the file you reviewed for peer review, please send a [RFR]
(Request For Review) mail with the reviewed file attached...then a few
days later, when no more contributions come, a summary mail with a
[LCFC] (Last Chance For Comments) label.

Finally, after no more comments coming to the LCFC mail, you can send
the reviewed templates file as a bug report against the package.

Then, please notify the list with a last mail using a [BTS] label
with the bug number.

Helping the package maintainer to deal with induced translation
updates at that momebt will be nice. If you're not comfortable with
that part of the process, please hand it off to a translator.

-- 


Template: ssbd/udpport
Type: string
Default: 7890
_Description: UDP port for ssbd:
Source: ssbd
Section: hamradio
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Uploaders: Jaime Robles <jaime@debian.org>, Joop Stakenborg <pa3aba@debian.org>, Patrick Ouellette <pouelle@debian.org>, Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), po-debconf, libglib2.0-dev, libsndfile1-dev, autoconf, automake1.9
Standards-Version: 3.7.2

Package: ssbd
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, debconf
Description: voice keyer for hamradio use
 Ssbd (SSB daemon) is a voice keyer to be used by hamradio operators.
 It's written as part of Tucnak, a contest log for VHF contests, but it is
 possible to use ssbd with any other program.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: