[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should manpages-nl get shipped with woody?

In article <[🔎] E16w7g0-0000Yq-00@mraha>, josX  <joshb@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>I honestly don't see how you can doubt wether they should be included.
>They are for basic packages, or for system calls.

And information for both have been updated a lot. The old manpage
for syscall contained a number of errors that have been corrected
for example.

>Therefore the remark "probably obsolete" is, to be honest, quite wrong
>as well as quite stupid.

Try `outdated, has known incorrect information' then.


 /       Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool     \
| wichert@wiggy.net                   http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-l10n-dutch-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: