tags 593622 + fixed-upstream pending thanks On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:58:56PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Hi, > > Le 19/08/2010 15:12, Roger Leigh a écrit : > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:24:48AM -0700, Joe Dalton wrote: > >> Package: schroot > >> Severity: wishlist > >> Tags: l10n patch > >> > >> Please include the attached Danish debconf translations > > > > Many thanks for the new translations. However, they seem to have > > got mangled at some point: > > > > -# deprecated -> deprecieret (forældet bruges her om obsolete). > > +# deprecated -> deprecieret (for??ldet bruges her om obsolete). > > > > -# snapshot -> øjebliksbillede > > +# snapshot -> ??jebliksbillede > > > > Perhaps by your email client or possibly even the text editor? > > Roger, the file is fine, your MUA may be affected by #537061 (Simon > provided a workaround more than one year ago when he submitted this bug). > > > If this could be fixed, I'll be happy to include it! > > Please find attached the previous file gzipped in order not to let Mutt > mess with the encoding stuff. Thanks! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed this before; maybe I've been lucky. Given that both my locale and the file are both UTF-8 encodings, I'm not sure why any recoding took place! Actually, looking more closely at the raw email message for the attachment: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" That's incorrect, so is probably why it stripped out all the non-ASCII characters and replaced them with '?'s. I agree that it's still stupid to recode an attachment though! Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
Description: Digital signature