Re: Kernel 2.6.36
Hi Klaus,
Klaus Knopper-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:39:59AM -0700, stirner wrote:
>> Another kernel another patch!!!
>
> Right, I just noticed they removed blk_fs_request() and locked_ioctl in
> Kernel 2.6.36.
>
>> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.36'
>> CC [M] /usr/src/cloop-2.634/compressed_loop.o
>> /usr/src/cloop-2.634/compressed_loop.c: In function 'cloop_do_request':
>> /usr/src/cloop-2.634/compressed_loop.c:384: error: implicit declaration
>> of
>> function 'blk_fs_request'
>> /usr/src/cloop-2.634/compressed_loop.c: At top level:
>> /usr/src/cloop-2.634/compressed_loop.c:905: error: unknown field
>> 'locked_ioctl' specified in initializer
>> make[2]: *** [/usr/src/cloop-2.634/compressed_loop.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [_module_/usr/src/cloop-2.634] Error 2
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.36'
>> make: *** [cloop.ko] Error 2
>>
>> No rush
>
> I just made a quick fix that compiles with Kernel 2.6.36 now (patch for
> cloop-2.6.34 attached), but need to wait for aufs 2.1 being ready for
> kernel 2.6.36 before I can test the new cloop version in a Knoppix live
> session, so, please don't rely on this patch yet. Tests/Bugreports are
> welcome, of course. Especially losetup ioctls have to be tested, since
> there is a call to lock_kernel().
>
> Regards
> -Klaus
>
> --- cloop-2.634/compressed_loop.c 2010-08-25 13:35:21.000000000 +0200
> +++ cloop-2.636/compressed_loop.c 2010-10-25 22:01:48.000000000 +0200
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> */
>
> #define CLOOP_NAME "cloop"
> -#define CLOOP_VERSION "2.634"
> +#define CLOOP_VERSION "2.636"
> #define CLOOP_MAX 8
>
> #ifndef KBUILD_MODNAME
> @@ -381,7 +381,9 @@
> struct cloop_device *clo;
> int rw;
> /* quick sanity checks */
> - if (unlikely(!blk_fs_request(req))) goto error_continue;
> + /* blk_fs_request() was removed in 2.6.36 */
> + if (unlikely(req == NULL || (req->cmd_type != REQ_TYPE_FS)))
> + goto error_continue;
> rw = rq_data_dir(req);
> if (unlikely(rw != READ && rw != READA))
> {
> @@ -835,6 +837,7 @@
> cloop_num = MINOR(bdev->bd_dev);
> if (cloop_num < 0 || cloop_num > cloop_count-1) return -ENODEV;
> clo = &cloop_dev[cloop_num];
> + lock_kernel();
> switch (cmd)
> { /* We use the same ioctls that loop does */
> case LOOP_CHANGE_FD:
> @@ -867,6 +870,7 @@
> default:
> err = -EINVAL;
> }
> + unlock_kernel();
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -902,7 +906,8 @@
> owner: THIS_MODULE,
> open: cloop_open,
> release: cloop_close,
> - locked_ioctl: cloop_ioctl
> + ioctl: cloop_ioctl
> + /* locked_ioctl ceased to exist in 2.6.36 */
> };
>
> static int cloop_register_blkdev(int major_nr)
>
>
Does not work for me:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/srv/home/tschmitt/linbo/linuxmuster-linbo/trunk/kernel/linux-2.6.36'
CC [M]
/srv/home/tschmitt/linbo/linuxmuster-linbo/trunk/kernel/cloop-2.631/compressed_loop.o
/srv/home/tschmitt/linbo/linuxmuster-linbo/trunk/kernel/cloop-2.631/compressed_loop.c:
In function ‘cloop_ioctl’:
/srv/home/tschmitt/linbo/linuxmuster-linbo/trunk/kernel/cloop-2.631/compressed_loop.c:840:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘lock_kernel’
/srv/home/tschmitt/linbo/linuxmuster-linbo/trunk/kernel/cloop-2.631/compressed_loop.c:873:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘unlock_kernel’
make[3]: ***
[/srv/home/tschmitt/linbo/linuxmuster-linbo/trunk/kernel/cloop-2.631/compressed_loop.o]
Fehler 1
Both 2.634 and 2.636 patches were applied to cloop 2.631.
Regards
Thomas Schmitt
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Kernel-2.6.36-tp30048538p30084614.html
Sent from the debian-knoppix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Reply to: