Re: [debian-knoppix] how to remaster knoppix 3.8.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 23:53 schrieb airplays55@yahoo.com:
> What is the prescribed method to remaster knoppix
> 3.8.1?
We haven't written one, yet.
>
> Won't there be a vastly SIMPLIFED remastering method
> for knoppix 3.8+, made possible by UNIONFS?
Yes.
>
> I jumped through hoops to remaster 3.4, BUT with
> UNIONFS, and tools from (or similar to) those at
> linux-live.org, why can't we expect a simple
> remastering method that won't even require a harddrive
> installation?
It should be as easy as:
mkdir /mnt/hdaX/master/
cp -a /cdrom/* /mnt/hdaX/master
SORT=""
mkisofs -input-charset ISO-8859-15 -R -U $SORT \
-no-split-symlink-components -no-split-symlink-fields \
-V "KNOPPIX_FS" \
-publisher "Fabian Franz" \
-p "www.fabian-franz.de" \
-hide-rr-moved -cache-inodes -no-bak -pad \
-m /proc/\* -m /sys/\* -m /mnt/\* -m /home/\* -m /root/\* / |
create_compressed_fs - 65536 > /mnt/hdaX/master/KNOPPIX/KNOPPIX
After you have done your changes. Then use the normal way from the Knoppix
remasteringHowTo or just:
DEST=/mnt/hdaX/master/
rm -f /tmp/knoppix.sort
echo "$DEST/boot/isolinux/* 111111" >/tmp/knoppix.sort
echo "$DEST/ct/* -10000" >>/tmp/knoppix.sort
echo "$DEST/LinuxTag/* -10000" >>/tmp/knoppix.sort
echo "$DEST/LinuxTag/Song/* -10000" >>/tmp/knoppix.sort
echo "$DEST/Demos/Audio/*.mp3 -10000" >>/tmp/knoppix.sort
echo "$DEST/Demos/Audio/*.ogg -10000" >>/tmp/knoppix.sort
mkisofs -input-charset ISO-8859-15 -pad -l -R -U -J \
-sort /tmp/knoppix.sort \
-V 'KNOPPIX' -A 'KNOPPIX LIVE LINUX CD' \
-P "Fabian Franz" \
-no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table -b
boot/isolinux/isolinux.bin -c boot/isolinux/boot.cat \
-hide-rr-moved \
-o "myiso.iso" "$DEST"
Note you should recreate md5sums first, but this should be explained in above
docs.
cu
Fabian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCZ+tFI0lSH7CXz7MRAn2tAJ448U0g67ZLOQp6khkzXPxUYvTm4QCfRix3
qbdPcpoGhOAGilfDWsfPtwQ=
=RvUH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: