[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [debian-knoppix] Knoppix in India



I have not read the article but I am aware of few ongoing attempts/plans
to localise Knoppix to Indic languages.
Knoppix is going places :-)

In this context it is worth noting that the PANGO library (independent
of GNOME and GTK2+ but nevertheless well integrated into GNOME)
[pango.gnome.org]is very useful for standards in internationalising free
software.

(therefore)Only GNOME renders UNICODE and provides true futuristic
solution to global advocacy.

Anyone seen a well writen article here
<http://tldp.org/LDP/LG/current/sunil.html>
"I Built a Custom Debian CD from Knoppix
By Sunil Thomas Thonikuzhiyil "

It is true GNOPPIX and similar variants  might provide a good solution
(with ample space for other software to make localisation possible) but
one of the beauties of GNU/Linux is the wide choice of desktops.

Even as more specialised variants of Knoppix come about it will be good
to see  Knoppix itself *somehow* catering to all needs and serve as the
central advocacy material.

Best Wishes

Ramanan  
 

On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 21:13, North London John wrote:
> FYI,
> India Gets Its First Linux Publication
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6665
> 
> "The first issue contains a CD of the popular load-it-from-your-CD 
> Knoppix distribution and news inputs come from a wide range."
> 
> The article doesn't say how many copies were printed / cds pressed.
> 
> John
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> debian-knoppix mailing list
> debian-knoppix@linuxtag.org
> http://mailman.linuxtag.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-knoppix
> 


_______________________________________________
debian-knoppix mailing list
debian-knoppix@linuxtag.org
http://mailman.linuxtag.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-knoppix


Reply to: