[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [debian-knoppix] Taredemark vs copyright.



Colin Marquardt wrote:
Gilles Pelletier <gilpel@altern.org> writes:
A copyright is given to somebody -- an individual, a corporation, etc. -- for work -- a song, a novel, a chemical process, an OS, etc. -- which is unique, something that hasn't been done before, so that nobody can copy it during a certain amount of time.

If you had said "In some countries, a copyright is given to somebody [...]", I would even agree.

No so sure about a chemical process... If your chemical process is describe into a 2 pages text, then you can have a copyright on those two page. But this give you no right on the chemical process itself. And I could describe the same process using my words without infringement.

Now if you ask for a patent on that chemical process, and it is granted to you in country X. Then in that country, if I want to use your process for industrial application, I should ask you a licence. And if you refuse me this licence, I can take you to court and force you to licence it (for a "fair" price) to me.

Now for a song, you have many copyright, the music, the lyrics, the arrangement, ...

It is not that "nobody can copy it", you can make copy for private use, copy for backup purpose, ... There are many unregulated use of copyrighted works. But if you want to sell/distribute/broadcast, you better check if this is permitted in your country and who you should pay for the right to do that (if they accept).

David GLAUDE

_______________________________________________
debian-knoppix mailing list
debian-knoppix@linuxtag.org
http://mailman.linuxtag.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-knoppix


Reply to: