On Monday, 20 May 2024 12:41:48 CEST Ben Hutchings wrote: > > - Can I do anything for you? > > My top priority would be more computing resources for Salsa, and > particularly for CI runners. +1 That was the first thing that came to my mind too, but it felt out of place for me to suggest that. I've less problems giving a '+1' on a suggestion from someone like Ben. >From "Salsa stats for the curious" on debian-project ML: On Friday, 12 April 2024 17:32:04 CEST Joerg Jaspert wrote: > The VM this all runs on has 8 cores and 32g I had several thoughts about that: - The PC on which I'm typing this email has twice the resources - It's impressive that the whole of Salsa can run on that - But why doesn't have f.e. 4x or 8x those resources? I think Salsa is great and I'm a big fan of CI. But IMO Salsa isn't exactly fast and particularly running the CI pipelines takes (way) longer then I'd like. The major value of a CI is in providing a fast feedback loop. Not hindered by any knowledge in this specific area, this seems an area where throwing money at it will actually help. Possibly substantially. Cheers, Diederik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.