[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#833035: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Keyspan USB serial adapter USA-49WLC failed to load firmware



Hi Jakob,

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:03:19AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Jakob,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Jakob Haufe wrote:
> > This still affects 5.15.0-3-amd64:
> > 
> > [624300.704569] usb 5-1: new full-speed USB device number 2 using ohci-pci
> > [624300.901723] usb 5-1: New USB device found, idVendor=06cd, idProduct=011a, bcdDevice=80.01
> > [624300.901746] usb 5-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=0, SerialNumber=0
> > [624300.903869] keyspan 5-1:1.0: Keyspan - (without firmware) converter detected
> > [624300.904014] usb 5-1: firmware: direct-loading firmware keyspan/usa49wlc.fw
> > [624304.121517] usb 5-1: ezusb_ihex_firmware_download - ezusb_writememory failed writing internal memory (-110 7F92 00000000b8cbdc0a 1)
> > [624304.121545] usb 5-1: failed to load firmware "keyspan/usa49wlc.fw"
> > [624304.121559] keyspan: probe of 5-1:1.0 failed with error -2
> > 
> > The patch applies with some fuzz but still solves the issue.
> > Refreshed patch is attached.
> > 
> > Has anyone already contacted upstream about this? I couldn't find
> > anything related on the linux-usb ML.
> 
> Not that I'm aware of. Given you have a tested patch, would it be
> possible that you contact upstream about it, keeping us in the loop or
> at least notify when it is applied in mainline?

Jakob, were you able to forward the patch upstream? I'm including
Johan and linux-usb list in this reply now.

Johan, fo context, it is about an older bug reported in Debian as
https://bugs.debian.org/833035 with users of the Keyspan USB serial
adapter USA-49WLC faling to load firmware.

There was a patch used, in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833035#68 tough
which hs no commit message or Signed-off-by's . Original patch is from
Ben in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833035#24 .

Regards,
Salvatore


Reply to: