[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#934090: marked as done (built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:35:22 +0200
with message-id <YIKw+m5q/L8ISFQs@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules
has caused the Debian Bug report #934090,
regarding built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
934090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934090
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
package: src:linux
I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of built-in.

CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD
CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW
CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL
CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE
CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK
CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON
CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE
CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG
CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
hi,

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 06:11:50PM -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 wishlist
> > 
> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote:
> > > package: src:linux
> > > I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is
> > > always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of
> > > built-in.
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT
> > 
> > Ideally, yes; however pinctrl drivers may be needed very early during
> > boot so I don't know if these will work properly as modules.
> Fair enough. I don't have the hardware to test/verify. I have one
> laptop that uses canonlake one and its sd card reader works even if
> the pinctrl is a module but this is a big change so lets not fix it
> since its not broken. Feel free to close.

I have closed now this bugreport.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
Reply to: