[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules



hi,

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 06:11:50PM -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 wishlist
> > 
> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote:
> > > package: src:linux
> > > I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is
> > > always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of
> > > built-in.
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG
> > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT
> > 
> > Ideally, yes; however pinctrl drivers may be needed very early during
> > boot so I don't know if these will work properly as modules.
> Fair enough. I don't have the hardware to test/verify. I have one
> laptop that uses canonlake one and its sd card reader works even if
> the pinctrl is a module but this is a big change so lets not fix it
> since its not broken. Feel free to close.

I have closed now this bugreport.

Regards,
Salvatore


Reply to: