On Sat, 2018-02-03 at 00:45 +0000, Craig Small wrote: > Hi Antoine (and kernel and security teams), > Thanks for giving me the background as it's a kernel vulnerability not a > Procps one I wasn't aware of it. It's not a kernel vulnerability, but a class of application vulnerabilities that the kernel can protect against. Ben. > The change to Procps is pretty simple but given that you need to be running > a non Debian kernel without this parameter what's groups' opinion of the > urgency? > > I can throw in the sysctl configuration file and upload a release this > weekend if the consensus is it's needed or wait for the next upstream > Procps release which would be a month or so away. -- Ben Hutchings Every program is either trivial or else contains at least one bug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part