Re: Bug#889098: enforce fs.protected_hardlinks in sysctl.d by default
Hi Antoine (and kernel and security teams), Thanks for giving me the background as it's a kernel vulnerability not a Procps one I wasn't aware of it.
The change to Procps is pretty simple but given that you need to be running a non Debian kernel without this parameter what's groups' opinion of the urgency?
I can throw in the sysctl configuration file and upload a release this weekend if the consensus is it's needed or wait for the next upstream Procps release which would be a month or so away.
- Craig
--
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
Reply to: