On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 16:07 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi kernel team > > We at credativ are responsible for maintaining the Azure cloud images. > We got asked by Microsoft to explore the possibilities of introducing a > specialised Linux image for this plattform into Debian. The main > enhancements we look at would be: > - faster boot of the instance, > - smaller memory footprint of the running kernel, and > - new features. We've spent the last decade slowly moving away from platform-specific to generic multiplatform kernels on ARM (and, to a lesser extent, x86). I strongly disagree with adding a new flavour that would be specific to one vendor's platform. However, if it is possible to create a single flavour that provides those sorts of enhancements for multiple cloud platforms, I think that would be worthwhile. > We don't want to introduce a new source package as was done for > grsecurity. This may work, as Microsoft mainly targets the latest > kernel, which is not always nice. > > That's why I would like to add such an image as a featureset to the main > Linux package. This will allow us to look at the downsides of the > approach in terms of maintenance overhead, build time, archive space > etc. If it does not work: disabling a featureset is easy. > > As first step we will not add patches, so the only thing that can break > is the config. But just in case I'll propose the following rules for > patches: > - must be in Linus tree, > - must be in a subsystem maintainers tree, or > - are in linux-next (not sure about this one). Those are basically the same criteria we normally use, so I don't understand your desire to add a featureset. Ben. > Would it be okay with you if we try this? Do you see other problem with > such an approach? > > Bastian > -- Ben Hutchings Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part