On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 15:24 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 16/07/17 23:31, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: tag -1 upstream patch > > > > On Sun, 2017-07-16 at 23:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:10 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: [...] > > > > James Cowgill told me that this is actually a kernel bug: > > > > https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2017-03/msg00580.html > > > > > > That's now a 404, strangely. Did you mean "[PATCH 0/2] Fix indirect > > > syscall handler for syscalls with > 4 args"? > > Hmm, I may have made a typo with that link. Here's the real one: > https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2017-03/msg00575.html > > > James - assuming I guessed correctly above, why is it that the second > > patch "MIPS: Remove pt_regs adjustments in indirect syscall handler" > > hasn't been applied? Was this fixed some other way upstream? > > I've just tried with v4.13-rc1 and the bug is still not fixed there. My > guess is that the first patch is more obviously correct than the second > one so was applied first. I have never received any feedback on these > patches so I don't actually know why only one of them was applied. I'm certainly not able to review this patch, so I won't apply it until it's either accepted upstream or reviewed by Aurelien or another MIPS porter. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part