Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:48:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4b8c16fb-e8e4-475a-2487-78cdbcac6d50@aixigo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1496498394.3992.33.camel@decadent.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 09ca18e6-aa4e-215f-5f22-ef4de6f5370a@aixigo.de> <[🔎] 1496394989.3992.29.camel@decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 1ba1f74e-a493-9842-434e-b7bb60c85314@aixigo.de> <[🔎] 1496498394.3992.33.camel@decadent.org.uk>

On 06/03/17 15:59, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 08:08 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> What would you suggest?
> 
> I would suggest not using linux-libc-dev from jessie-backports.
> 

This workaround is already known; see my first post in this
thread.

Regards
Harri

Reply to:

References:
- <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
  - From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
- Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
  - From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
- Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#862400: several bios updates exist since 2007
Next by Date: Processed: reassign 863875 to src:linux
Previous by thread: Re: <linux/if.h> and <net/if.h> conflict needs to be resolved for backports?
Next by thread: Processed: [bts-link] source package linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread