Bug#837710: liblockdep-dev: adequate reports broken symlink of liblockdep.so
at bottom :-
On 13/09/2016, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 19:18 +0000, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> Package: liblockdep-dev
>> Version: 4.6.4-1
>> Severity: normal
>> Usertags: broken-symlink adequate
>> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> Adequate reported broken symlink in liblockdep-dev
>>
>> liblockdep-dev:amd64: broken-symlink
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblockdep.so -> liblockdep.so.4.6
>>
>> I went to the relevant directory to see if this indeed was true and
>> sure enough there isn't a liblockdep.so.4.6
>>
>> > ┌─[shirish@debian] - [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu] - [10182]
>> └─[$] ls -l liblockdep.*
>>
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52902 Jul 19 01:27 liblockdep.a
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jul 19 01:27 liblockdep.so ->
>> liblockdep.so.4.6
>
> This package should depend on liblockdep4.6 which does contain that file.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
>
Dear Ben,
Thank you for responding so quickly. I found the same a few minutes
after and filed #837713 for the same. You can either close it or make
this dependant on the other bug as this one is a manifestation due to
the other one which probably is the real issue.
Thank you for doing all the wonderful work on the kernel :)
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Reply to: