On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 19:18 +0000, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Package: liblockdep-dev > Version: 4.6.4-1 > Severity: normal > Usertags: broken-symlink adequate > User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org > > Dear Maintainer, > > Adequate reported broken symlink in liblockdep-dev > > liblockdep-dev:amd64: broken-symlink > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblockdep.so -> liblockdep.so.4.6 > > I went to the relevant directory to see if this indeed was true and > sure enough there isn't a liblockdep.so.4.6 > > > ┌─[shirish@debian] - [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu] - [10182] > └─[$] ls -l liblockdep.* > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52902 Jul 19 01:27 liblockdep.a > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jul 19 01:27 liblockdep.so -> liblockdep.so.4.6 This package should depend on liblockdep4.6 which does contain that file. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part