On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 08:11 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Dear Ben, > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > > Dear Kernel Maintainer, > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Shawn Guo the Linux kernel maintainer of ARM/Freescale IMX / MXC ARM > > > architecture has accepted my appended patch 0001-ARM... to change the > > > model id of the Wandboard Quad Rev B1 and the Wandboard Dual Rev B1. > > > > > > See > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/14/34 > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/7/270 > > > > > > I suggest to add the patch to > > > linux-source-4.3 (debian/patches/bugfix/arm) > > > and to update flash-kernel (patch 0001-db... appended). > > > > I also have a few device-tree "fixes", as well as "for-next" applied > > by upstream sub-system maintainer. > > For "fixes", some of those're already got merged into linus's 4.5-rc > > tree, and will, AFAIK, be backported to each related/affected stable > > kernel, and finally reach Debian's stable kernel; for "for-next", it's > > waiting for the next merge window (to say, 4.6). > > > > I also want to know what's debian's kernel policy [0] on backporting > > those device-tree file. > > > > Please help to clarify. Thank you! > > > > [0]: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines > > Could you help to comment on this, please? > > If you think backporting those device-tree to "master"/"sid" is fine, > I can handle both the patch mention in this thread and a few > Linkstation device-tree patch I submitted. Yes, this is all fine for sid. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part