Bug#813881: [PATCH 1/1 v3] ARM: dts: imx6dlq-wandboard-revb1.dts: use unique model id
Dear Ben,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Kernel Maintainer,
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Shawn Guo the Linux kernel maintainer of ARM/Freescale IMX / MXC ARM
>> architecture has accepted my appended patch 0001-ARM... to change the
>> model id of the Wandboard Quad Rev B1 and the Wandboard Dual Rev B1.
>>
>> See
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/14/34
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/7/270
>>
>> I suggest to add the patch to
>> linux-source-4.3 (debian/patches/bugfix/arm)
>> and to update flash-kernel (patch 0001-db... appended).
>
> I also have a few device-tree "fixes", as well as "for-next" applied
> by upstream sub-system maintainer.
> For "fixes", some of those're already got merged into linus's 4.5-rc
> tree, and will, AFAIK, be backported to each related/affected stable
> kernel, and finally reach Debian's stable kernel; for "for-next", it's
> waiting for the next merge window (to say, 4.6).
>
> I also want to know what's debian's kernel policy [0] on backporting
> those device-tree file.
>
> Please help to clarify. Thank you!
>
> [0]: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
Could you help to comment on this, please?
If you think backporting those device-tree to "master"/"sid" is fine,
I can handle both the patch mention in this thread and a few
Linkstation device-tree patch I submitted.
Thank you!
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 17B3ACB1
Reply to: