A Dimecres, 15 de gener de 2014, Roland Stigge va escriure: > On 01/15/2014 01:16 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> In addition, kernels supported by official Xenomai patches also > >> typically differ from the ones that Debian ships. > >> > >> Since Debian synchronizes quite well now with kernel.org stable > >> branches, there is at least a good chance to synchronize in this > >> second regard. > > > > Since Leopold is talking about generating patched linux images, does it > > really matter if they do not use the same versions as the ones used by > > Debian? > > Yes, if it's included in Debian stable, we would need to trust someone > who steps up to support the respective package (i.e. its over time aging > version) for security updates for years. > > When it's "only" in backports, there is no such hard restriction. > I like the option of backports. Also, an outdated version in stable could be a good option for an starting place for a new user. However, I would like to see the kernel maintainers opinion. Leopold PS. Really, if we could have it, we can then have a bunch of realtime software packages, so we could have some debianrt ecosystem!!!! -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.