[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#742226: linux-image-3.13-1-amd64: Internet banking fails to detect Java with Debian kernels



Control: tag -1 moreinfo

On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 18:54 -0300, Gurvan Huiban wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.13.6-1
> Severity: important
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> When using Debian kernels, my browser fails to detect Java when
> accessing my Internet Banking. When using vanilla kernels, everything
> works perfectly.
> 
> More precisely:
> The Internet banking site is Banco do Brasil (http://www.bb.com.br .
> Clicking on the small blue OK button on the top of the page launches
> the Java security applet required to access the bank account).
> On the same computer:
> - When booting with the linux-image-3.13-1-amd64, the browser returns
> an error (No Java detected)
> - When booting with the vanilla linux kernel (3.13.6, compiled with
> kernel-package), the Java applet executes normally.
> 
> This problem seems to be independent from the Internet browser (the
> same behavior is observed with Iceweasel, Chromium and Opera) and
> independent from the Java version (problem observed with OpenJDK6,
> OpenJDK7 and Oracle's Java 7).
> 
> Note that this problem was oberved with other versions of the kernel
> (3.10 for instance), but does not occur on Wheezy (Unless the kernel
> is upgraded with Jessie's one for instance).
> 
> I believe that one of the patch applied on Debian kernel interferes
> with the relationship between the Browser and Java when running the
> Internet banking applet.

We don't patch very much, so my suspicion is that this is purely
triggered by the version number (only 2 dotted components).

> Could you please investigated?

So there's an easy way to check this.  Try quitting Iceweasel and then
restarting it with the command:

    setarch x86_64 --uname-2.6 iceweasel

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: