[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#728668: linux-image-3.11-1-powerpc: nouveau kernel message every 10 seconds: E[ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1



On 11/04/2013 10:07 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:11:30AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On 11/04/2013 05:01 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> Do you have something connected to the TV-1 output?
>> As far as i know, there is no TV-1 output.  It's this style of machine:
>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/IMac_G4_sunflower7.png/250px-IMac_G4_sunflower7.png
>> I don't think the built-in monitor (1440×900px) would be considered
>> connected to TV-1 for a machine like this.
> 
> Nope. It is most likely connected via LVDS.
> 
> There is a workaround available:
> Add the parameter tv_disable=1 to nouveau,
> - either somewhere in /etc/modprobe.d
> | options nouveau tv_disable=1
>   or
> - on the kernel command line
> | nouveau.tv_disable=1

hm.  I have tried both of these, and the kernel is still printing an
error message every 10 seconds:

0 root@omega:~# cat /sys/module/nouveau/parameters/tv_disable
1
0 root@omega:~# dmesg | tail
[   19.586460] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[   38.398826] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[   48.446712] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[   58.494666] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[   68.542632] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[   78.590642] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[   88.638636] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[   98.686654] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[  108.734669] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
[  118.782642] nouveau E[     DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for TV-1
0 root@omega:~#

any other suggestions?

i note that there is also /sys/modules/nouveau/pramaeters/tv_norm,
though i don't know what it is supposed to do.

	--dkg


Reply to: