Re: Re: Re: Additional IPv6 addresses on bond interface marked as dadfailed

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Additional IPv6 addresses on bond interface marked as dadfailed
From: Florian Zavatzki <fz@europaymentgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:58:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 51A471AC.8080008@europaymentgroup.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1369676241.3469.390.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 1369676241.3469.390.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>

The problem was that the cabling of the server in the DC was wrong.
After correction everything is working as expected.

Sorry for the wrong conclusion and thanks for the hint with the trunk.

Bye,
Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Re: Additional IPv6 addresses on bond interface marked as dadfailed
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#464501: eSCO support breaks (SCO?) headsets
Next by Date: Bug#709989: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: General protection fault after I/O on ext3 in KVM
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Additional IPv6 addresses on bond interface marked as dadfailed
Next by thread: Bug#710004: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: lxc-checkcopnfig reports missing CONFIG_CGROUP_NS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread