[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#658759: [arm/kirkwood] compressed image does not boot



On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 15:30 -0600, purdyd tds.net wrote:
> Thanks, Ian.
> 
> I understand.  Do any of you know if there are any ready-rolled u-boot
> binaries for Dockstar available out there that incorporate this fix?

No idea I'm afraid.

Given that #658759 has been filed against u-boot in Debian I expect a
new package will be along shortly.

Ian.

> 
> Perhaps tbm's u-boot upgrades here :  ??
> http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/uboot-upgrade.html
> 
> thnx,
> Davy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
> wrote:
>         On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:42 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>         > Ian Campbell wrote:
>         >
>         > > I suspect this is due to the lack of this u-boot patch:
>         > >
>         http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-February/117020.html
>         > >
>         > > I found that without this my 3.2 dreamplug kernel would
>         not boot (with
>         > > the 2011.12-2 package from debian). It's related to
>         > > CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT.
>         >
>         > For the record, this proposed u-boot change has been filed
>         as
>         > <http://bugs.debian.org/658904>.
>         >
>         > The inability to work with versions of u-boot without that
>         change
>         > (workaround?) in the default configuration still would seem
>         to be a
>         > regression in the kernel, so pointers toward solving it
>         would be very
>         > welcome.
>         
>         I hacked my kernel (the Kconfig files) to allow me to turn off
>         PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and it also worked.
>         
>         However AIUI PATCH_VIRT_PHYS is part of the infrastructure
>         which allows
>         a single kernel flavour to boot on multiple machines so
>         turning it off
>         is not a viable workaround.
>         
>         I think this is just a latent bug in u-boot which has been
>         exposed by a
>         recent kernel changes and should be treated as a bug to be
>         fixed in
>         u-boot. I personally wouldn't consider it a regression in the
>         kernel (at
>         least based on my understanding of what's going on).
>         
>         Ian.
>         
>         
> 

-- 
Ian Campbell


It'll be a nice world if they ever get it finished.




Reply to: