[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#658670: 3w-9xxx abnormally slows the system down

Dear Jonathan,

first of all thank You for the prompt reply, the merging, the proper
command to directly report on this bug and sorry for the
inconvenience. However the #612712 kicked in ("UnicodeEncodeError:
'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u201c' in position 734:
ordinal not in range(128)") therefore I'm going to use the webmail

I feel that the most important is finding where the regression is
introduced so fast forward to linux-image-3.0.0-2-amd64_3.0.0-6_amd64
and the only thing I can tell is that it is still free from this

I keep You updated.

Yours truly,

Csaba GAÁL

2012/2/5 Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
> merge 658670 658727
> quit
> Csaba GAAL wrote:
> > [To: submit@bugs.debian.org]
> For the future, you can followup by sending email to
> 658670@bugs.debian.org (for example using your mailer's "reply to all"
> feature), or, if you don't have a working email setup, by using
> "reportbug -N 658670".  Submitting a separate new bug with each
> message just makes for more work on this end...
> [...]
> > Just a preview of what's coming: still linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64_2.6.39-3_amd64
> > is free from this speed regression problem, however for the record I am going to
> > file separate reports for:
> > 1) linux-image-2.6.35-rc5-amd64_2.6.35~rc5-1~experimental.1_amd64
> > 2) linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64_2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1_amd64
> > 3) linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64_2.6.37-2_amd64
> > 4) linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64_2.6.38-5_amd64
> > 5) linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64_2.6.39-3_amd64
> No thank you.  So, which is the first version with the speed degredation?
> Thanks for the quick followup.
> Sincerely,
> Jonathan

Reply to: