[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#655344: linux-image-3.1.0-1-kirkwood: Missing support for LaCie machines



On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:08, Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org> wrote:
> Simon Guinot <simon@sequanux.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 3.1.6-1
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> The kernel image provided by package linux-image-3.1.0-1-kirkwood don't
>> support the LaCie Kirkwood boards.
>>
>> Please, consider applying the following patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/config/armel/config.kirkwood b/config/armel/config.kirkwood
>> index 1eae313..85b0c64 100644
>> --- a/config/armel/config.kirkwood
>> +++ b/config/armel/config.kirkwood
>> @@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ CONFIG_MACH_DOCKSTAR=y
>>  CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_BASE=y
>>  CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT=y
>>  CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE=y
>> +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_V2=y
>> +CONFIG_MACH_INETSPACE_V2=y
>> +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_MAX_V2=y
>> +CONFIG_MACH_D2NET_V2=y
>> +CONFIG_MACH_NET2BIG_V2=y
>> +CONFIG_MACH_NET5BIG_V2=y
>>  CONFIG_MACH_T5325=y
>>
>>  ##
>> @@ -172,6 +178,11 @@ CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS=y
>>  # CONFIG_DRM is not set
>>
>>  ##
>> +## file: drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
>> +##
>> +CONFIG_SENSORS_GPIO_FAN=m
>> +
>> +##
>>  ## file: drivers/i2c/Kconfig
>>  ##
>>  CONFIG_I2C=y
>> @@ -244,6 +255,8 @@ CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_MAINT=m
>>  CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=y
>> +CONFIG_LEDS_NS2=y
>> +CONFIG_LEDS_NETXBIG=y
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=y
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=y
>
> Does this really need to be built-in ? (side note: if it can't work as
> module, why is it a tristate and not a boolean in kernel config ?)
>
It seems a bit odd that Sheeva plug, Guru plug, Dockstar, OpenRD, Qnap
and others(?) support is built-in, but support for Lacie is not. I'm
not a (kernel)developer, so I don't know what problems this will bring
up. But as a user I would appreciate it if Lacie support was in the
standard kernel. If there is any reason this is not possible, I'll
accept that off course.

regards, Tjalling

> Also, do you plan to add support for them into d-i (unless it's already
> done) ?
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to 655344-unsubscribe@bugs.debian.org.



Reply to: