[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#536860: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c)



Your message dated Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:17:40 +0200
with message-id <20110808111740.GA27641@elie.gateway.2wire.net>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c
has caused the Debian Bug report #536860,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
536860: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536860
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64
Version: 2.6.26-17
Severity: important

Running iotop I get lots of:

Jul 14 09:44:30 mailq kernel: [1285719.964489] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:30 mailq kernel: [1285719.964558] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:30 mailq kernel: [1285719.964594] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf14] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x4c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:30 mailq kernel: [1285719.964630] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf28] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x60/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:30 mailq kernel: [1285719.964667] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf48] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x80/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:36 mailq kernel: [1285726.011965] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:36 mailq kernel: [1285726.012031] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:36 mailq kernel: [1285726.012066] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf14] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x4c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:36 mailq kernel: [1285726.012100] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf28] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x60/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:36 mailq kernel: [1285726.012135] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf48] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x80/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:14 mailq kernel: [1285764.277939] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:14 mailq kernel: [1285764.278022] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:14 mailq kernel: [1285764.278057] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf14] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x4c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:14 mailq kernel: [1285764.278091] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf28] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x60/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:14 mailq kernel: [1285764.278127] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf48] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x80/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:19 mailq kernel: [1285769.512383] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:19 mailq kernel: [1285769.512464] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:19 mailq kernel: [1285769.512500] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf14] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x4c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:19 mailq kernel: [1285769.512535] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf28] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x60/0x15c
Jul 14 09:45:19 mailq kernel: [1285769.512572] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf48] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x80/0x15c
Jul 14 10:00:09 mailq kernel: [1286659.651335] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
Jul 14 10:00:10 mailq kernel: [1286659.651417] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf10] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x48/0x15c
Jul 14 10:00:10 mailq kernel: [1286659.651453] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf14] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x4c/0x15c
Jul 14 10:00:10 mailq kernel: [1286659.651488] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf28] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x60/0x15c
Jul 14 10:00:10 mailq kernel: [1286659.651525] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bf48] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x80/0x15c


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-sparc64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.24     Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.92o      tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools             3.4-1      tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64 suggests:
pn  fdutils            <none>                (no description available)
pn  linux-doc-2.6.26   <none>                (no description available)
ii  silo               1.4.13a+git20070930-3 Sparc Improved LOader

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/abort-install-2.6.26-2-sparc64:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.26-2-sparc64:
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.26-2-sparc64:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.26-2-sparc64: false
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.26-2-sparc64:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.26-2-sparc64:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/initrd-2.6.26-2-sparc64:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
* linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.26-2-sparc64:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.26-2-sparc64: false
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.26-2-sparc64: true



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.39-3

Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Gabriel VLASIU wrote:

>>> Running iotop I get lots of:
>>>
>>> Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
>>
>> I suspect this was fixed by v2.6.38-rc1~296 (taskstats: use better
>> ifdef for alignment, 2011-01-12).  Could you test a recent kernel
>> from sid or experimental, or try the following patch?
>
> # uname -r
> 2.6.39-2-sparc64
> # dpkg -l | grep iotop
> ii  iotop                                    0.4.3-1                      simple top-like I/O monitor
>
> Kernel 2.6.39 seems to work just fine (iotop version 0.4-2 from squeeze 
> does not work with kernel 2.6.39).

Thanks for checking.  Marking accordingly.

I wonder how this should be dealt with wrt squeeze.  Would it be okay
to apply the alignment fix on platforms with slow unaligned access in
a stable update, or is it okay to say "if you want to use iotop on
such platforms, you will need to install it from
backports.debian.org"?


--- End Message ---

Reply to: