On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:52 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 15 April 2011 12:00, Ben Hutchings <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > [...] > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 > > > Thanks, I've set our bug tracker to follow that bug. > > Has it been established that it's the same bug though? > > I had a brief read of that and I'm not so sure. There's so many things > that could impact TX throughput. > > I don't have this problem on FreeBSD on my AR9285 NICs and I've ported > almost all of the (non-power saving) related code from ath9k. They > happily sit at the expected TX/RX speeds in 11g and 11n modes. > > Is someone who is experiencing the problem able to do some kernel > version bisecting between the known good and known bad kernel? The bug fix from the report on Bugzilla has been included in stable release 126.96.36.199 and Debian's version 2.6.38-5. Does this version fix the problem for you? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part