On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:53 +0000, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:08:10PM +0000, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:33:31AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote: > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:43:06PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > > <email@example.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, Ben, > > > > > > > > > > We've made significant progress in reducing the overhead of memory > > > > > cgroup subsystem. I'd request you to try it and enable it. If there > > > > > are some concerns, we could always address them. There are more > > > > > interesting changes on the way as well. > > > > could you point to the relevant commits? > > so unless this information comes along soon, > I'll revert my change. I prepared a patch to make memory cgroups built-in but disabled by default (message #31). The overhead then should be very small, but I still haven't spent the time to measure it. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part