Re: Candidates for longterm 2.6.32.y

[David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>]

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:27:24 +0100

> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:59 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
>> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:55:51 +0100
>> 
>> > The following changes are present in Debian's kernel based on 2.6.32,
>> > but not yet in 2.6.32.y.  I would like to send these to
>> > stable@kernel.org but I know you prefer to pick which networking changes
>> > go into stable/longterm updates.  Please could you have a look over the
>> > log and let me know if you think any of these are not suitable.
>> > 
>> > The complete set of changes I'm intending to send to stable for 2.6.32.y
>> > are on this branch:
>> > 
>> > git://git.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git squeeze-to-stable
>> 
>> Looks good, feel free to send these off to Andi Kleen for longterm
>> stable as I'm personally not making submissions to that tree,
>> the other two or three -stable trees are enough to keep track of
>> :-)
> 
> I'm primarily concerned with longterm 2.6.32.y, not whichever series
> Andi Kleen is looking after.  So should I submit these or will you?

Please do it, I'm already overloaded like.