On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:59 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> > Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:55:51 +0100 > > > The following changes are present in Debian's kernel based on 2.6.32, > > but not yet in 2.6.32.y. I would like to send these to > > stable@kernel.org but I know you prefer to pick which networking changes > > go into stable/longterm updates. Please could you have a look over the > > log and let me know if you think any of these are not suitable. > > > > The complete set of changes I'm intending to send to stable for 2.6.32.y > > are on this branch: > > > > git://git.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6.git squeeze-to-stable > > Looks good, feel free to send these off to Andi Kleen for longterm > stable as I'm personally not making submissions to that tree, > the other two or three -stable trees are enough to keep track of > :-) I'm primarily concerned with longterm 2.6.32.y, not whichever series Andi Kleen is looking after. So should I submit these or will you? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part