Bug#611750: 2nd update (Re: Bug#613790: pm-utils: eeepc 1005 PE recently stopped resuming from hibernate)
Le Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:56:20 +0100,
Emmanuel Charpentier <emm.charpentier@free.fr> a écrit :
> [ I Cc 611750@bugs.debian.org, which mi bug report seems to be a
> duplicate of... ]
and also 611551 (and perhaps others)…
> Dear all,
>
> A couple more data points :
>
> 1) I tried Sebastian Andrzej Siewio's 2.6.30 partially unpatched
> kernel, to no avail : my eee 1005PE still rebooted when trying to
> resume from hibernation (yes, I first rebooted on this partially
> patched kernel *before* hibernating...).
I'm agree.
> 2) restoring a 2.6.29 kernel from snapshots.debian.org "solved" the
> problem (for some small value of "solution").
ok.
> Hence :
>
> 1) At least on some eee hardware,
> drm-i915-overlay-ensure-that-the-reg_bo-is-in-the-gtt-prior-to-writing.patch
> is *not* the sole culprit.
>
> 2) Temporarily pinning the linux-image-2.6.32-5-586 package to 2.6.30
> may alleviate the problem, but cuts you off the opportunity to
> auto-upgrade to a future and hyothetical 2.6.31 package. Is there a
> way to configure apt to still auto-update if possible but to avoid
> 2.6.30 ?
>
> Question :
>
> Did someone tried to recompile the 2.6.30 package with the *three*
> drm-i915 patches reversed ? I used to recompile my kernels (after all,
> I'm following Debian on and off since about 1998...), but I'm no
> longer aware of the current "official" procedures to do so (any
> pointer to a *synthetic* doc ? ) and somewhat reluctant to undertake
> this on a netbook... :-).
I'll try, but at first, I'll do a try to suggestion of bug #611551
(disabling kprobes), then if I don't succeed restoring hibernation on
my eeepc, trying 2.6.32-30 kernel without 3 drm-i915 patches disabled.
I already have to recompile my own kernel to apply a patch about
my ethernet interface (also a problem about hibernation, see #577747).
I'll post results here (probably by end of week).
regards,
Fred.
Reply to: