On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 01:31 +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: [...] > I'm afraid this is absolutely not happening, this machine is a > webserver and I've just spent enough time bringing it back to life... > Besides squeeze is not shipping with 2.6.35, right? I'm hoping you > plan on releasing a working kernel for the upcoming stable release? Right, but if the bug is fixed in 2.6.35 then I can look for a fix in between, and if it is not then you can report the bug to upstream. > One thing I don't get is why the need to break a perfectly working > kernel (2.6.32-9)? Can't the specific change that introduced this bug > be simply reverted? If you could point out that change, perhaps. There have been a few thousand since then. Also note that 2.6.32-9 was released long before the freeze and there were some major changes in the next 2 revisions. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part