Re: [PATCH] Fix condition for adding IDE or SCSI disk driver when MODULES=dep
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The transition from old-style IDE to libata-based drivers means the
> new kernel may need different drivers from the running system. We
> already handle the change of controller driver correctly since we find
> driver modules via module aliases. However for the disk driver
> (sd_mod or ide-disk) we look at which types of devices exist in the
> running system, so we may not select the one we need.
>
> Since all the controller driver modules depend on the core modules
> under drivers/ide or drivers/scsi, we can work out which disk
> driver(s) may be needed by checking whether those module
> subdirectories have been created under the target directory.
>
> Reported-by: Gordon Farquharson <gordonfarquharson@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Thank you a lot for the excellent bug hunt.
> ---
> I've given this a very little testing and it seems to do the right
> thing. This obviously needs careful review!
>
> Ben.
>
> hook-functions | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hook-functions b/hook-functions
> index 0684296..da16478 100644
> --- a/hook-functions
> +++ b/hook-functions
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ dep_add_modules()
> sys_walk_mod_add ${root_dev_path}
>
> # catch old-style IDE
> - if [ -e /sys/bus/ide/devices/ ]; then
> + if [ -d "${DESTDIR}/lib/modules/${version}/kernel/drivers/ide" ]; then
Not sure I like this change, as this is a noop in any of our linux-2.6
> sys_walk_modalias ${root_dev_path}
> manual_add_modules ide-gd_mod
> # FIXME: remove post Squeeze
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ dep_add_modules()
> manual_add_modules ide-cd
> fi
>
> - if [ -e /sys/bus/scsi/devices/ ]; then
> + if [ -d "${DESTDIR}/lib/modules/${version}/kernel/drivers/scsi" ]; then
same here.
> manual_add_modules sd_mod
> fi
>
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
>
>
so instead of overoptimising here, I'd just remove both conditions.
Of course they can be left or readded post-squeeze.
what do you think?
--
maks
Reply to: