On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:52 -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Ben Hutchings <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > diff --git a/Documentation/Changes b/Documentation/Changes > > index 4fb88f1..23fc499 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/Changes > > +++ b/Documentation/Changes > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ isdn4k-utils. > > > > o Gnu C 3.2 # gcc --version > > o Gnu make 3.80 # make --version > > -o binutils 2.12 # ld -v > > +o binutils 2.12 (2.16 for ia64) # ld -v > > o util-linux 2.10o # fdformat --version > > o module-init-tools 0.9.10 # depmod -V > > o e2fsprogs 1.41.4 # e2fsck -V > > Won't this file become a complete mess if each architecture starts > specifying its own version for each of the tools? [...] Maybe, though the only things likely to need per-architecture fixes or features are gcc and binutils. By the way, I did a little more research and found that the bug unwcheck.py is checking for was in binutils 2.16, so the minimum would actually have to be 2.17 (or a distro-fixed 2.16). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part