On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 23:02 +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote: > reopen linux-2.6.32-5-amd64 > thanks > > It looks like I spoke too soon. > It occurred three times since I reported it fixed - meaning it works > about 4 out of 5 times. This looks like a similar bug to <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13745>, but that is supposed to have been fixed in stable update 220.127.116.11. I think we need to pass this upstream, but before that can you test Linux 2.6.36-rc5 as packaged in experimental? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part