[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pb kernel : kernel 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64



Hi Bertrand

I'm now forwarding your email to the openvz project so they can
answer on that question.

Best regards,

// Ola

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:20:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:15:55PM +0200, bertrand wrote:
> > Dear Mister or Madam,
> >
> > I am contacting you today because my company uses servers with a kernel  
> > "kernel 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64".
> >
> > We would like to know if this version is stable or not.
> 
> That kernel is part of the current Debian stable release (5.0, codename
> "lenny").  This does not necessarily mean that the kernel is stable in the
> sense of not crashing; it means that we make minimal changes to it to fix
> important bugs and to add support for new hardware.  However, we hope that
> this approach means there are few bugs in the kernel that can cause it to
> crash.
> 
> > The official website "http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel"; indicates  
> > that this version is not supported yet. Do you confirm this information ?
> 
> That may be the position of the OpenVZ project.
> 
> Ben.
> 
> -- 
> Ben Hutchings
> We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
>                                                               - Albert Camus
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 20100907172010.GB11033@decadent.org.uk">http://lists.debian.org/20100907172010.GB11033@decadent.org.uk
> 
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  ola@inguza.com                      654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  http://inguza.com/                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: