On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:54 -0700, Jeff Carr wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 20:26, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > > The kernel team (in conjunction with the security team) decided that one > > kernel per release is less trouble. > > Is there information available anywhere about this? (Maybe some > thoughts on things of this nature could be added to the debian kernel > handbook as a FAQ). I'm not sure that this is officially stated anywhere. > > There was an experiment with adding > > a later kernel version to the etch release, but I don't think the > > results were that positive. > > Sorry to be a bother, I'm still confused. This thread has been helpful > though. Thanks... > > Could you make the 2.6.35 package available in only sid? No, it would replace 2.6.32 since it is a newer version of the same source package. [...] > Could you provide some guidance as to what to expect? For instance, > are there not likely to be newer versions of the kernel in sid until > after squeeze gets released? Correct. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part