[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#535959: marked as done (linux-2.6: Please enable libata for PATA/piix)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:56:32 +0000
with message-id <1267142192.24602.174.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#444182: Reopen as there is no 2.6.33 in the archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #444182,
regarding linux-2.6: Please enable libata for PATA/piix
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
444182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444182
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal

Hi,

currently the Debian linux package explicitly disables libata for
ata_piix via
debian/patches/debian/drivers-ata-ata_piix-postpone-pata.patch.
which means that the old IDE subsystem is used for this chipset.
I'd like to see this patch removed, so libata is used by default.

Cheers,
Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:30 +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm reopening #444182 as there is no 2.6.33-1~experimental.1 or newer in
> the archive and the fix is not mentioned in the 2.6.32-3 changelog.

Don't be ridiculous.  It's in experimental.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: