Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:56:32 +0000 with message-id <1267142192.24602.174.camel@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#444182: Reopen as there is no 2.6.33 in the archive has caused the Debian Bug report #444182, regarding linux-source-2.6.22: drivers-ata-ata_piix-postpone-pata.patch prevents my dvd writer to be detected to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 444182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444182 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: linux-source-2.6.22: drivers-ata-ata_piix-postpone-pata.patch prevents my dvd writer to be detected
- From: ml1050 <ezerotven@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:55:27 +0200
- Message-id: <1350e0a90709260855m776121cds9ee9b27035d478e1@mail.gmail.com>
Package: linux-source-2.6.22 Version: 2.6.22-4 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi, The above mentioned patch does not work correctly with my HP nw8440 laptop. The laptop's sata port is correctly handled by the ahci module, however the pata port is not detected by ata_piix. When I readd the deleted line { 0x8086, 0x27DF, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ich_pata_133 }, to the piix_pci_tbl[] in drivers/ata/ata_piix.c, it fixes the problem. Please consider updating the patch. Thanks, Laszlo -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-ml3 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.22 depends on: ii binutils 2.18~cvs20070812-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.3-7 high-quality block-sorting file co Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.22 recommends: ii gcc 4:4.1.2-8 The GNU C compiler ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii make 3.81-2 The GNU version of the "make" util -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 444182-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#444182: Reopen as there is no 2.6.33 in the archive
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:56:32 +0000
- Message-id: <1267142192.24602.174.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <20100225203052.GF16094@anguilla.debian.or.at>
- References: <20100225203052.GF16094@anguilla.debian.or.at>
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:30 +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reopening #444182 as there is no 2.6.33-1~experimental.1 or newer in > the archive and the fix is not mentioned in the 2.6.32-3 changelog. Don't be ridiculous. It's in experimental. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchettAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---