Re: sid abi changes

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: sid abi changes
From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:45:56 +0100
Message-id: <20100219224556.GX19179@baikonur.stro.at>
In-reply-to: <20100219223551.GA4099@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <20100219183237.GA13804@stro.at> <20100219223551.GA4099@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by
> > a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump?
> 
> Yes.

and why?

please add reason, latest is not linked to it abi bump does not hurt at
all afais. d-i is still on 2.6.30 so also not an arg..

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sid abi changes
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

References:
- sid abi changes
  - From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
- Re: sid abi changes
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#570571: marked as done (kernel doesn't load if root is placed in LVM)
Next by Date: Re: sid abi changes
Previous by thread: Re: sid abi changes
Next by thread: Re: sid abi changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread