On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 23:45 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > > just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by > > > a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump? > > > > Yes. > > and why? > > please add reason, latest is not linked to it abi bump does not hurt at > all afais. Not yet... > d-i is still on 2.6.30 so also not an arg.. Really the ABI number has to be bumped unless the ABI changes can be avoided. If Bastian can figure out how to avoid changing existing symbols then I don't see a problem with the additions. I just don't think it's worth the trouble to do that yet. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life is like a sewer: what you get out of it depends on what you put into it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part