Bug#534430: Info received (linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken)
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 13:12 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:38:07AM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > Sorry, ignore my previous email.
> > I think I got to it, for whatever reason it is not getting set in
> > cbq_set_lss(), just can't figure out what is wrong.
> as per your posting on linux-netdev I understand this bug can be closed?
It is "bad english" in the output of tc combined with "bad timing" since
kernel has gone to high perf timers. 2.6.9 and even 2.6.18 delivered
considerably better traffic shaping performance.
> | > I am using CBQ myself with recent kernels and never found it
> | > 'borrowing', could you post a copy of your rules, or better, a subset of
> | > them desmonstrating the problem ?
> | Actually after going through it several times and looking at the code
> | Jarek pointed out it doesn't.
> | Just the stats are very confusing and precision is not particularly
> | great.
Understanding is a three-edged sword:
your side, their side, and the truth. --Kosh Naranek
A. R. Ivanov